In Candide, the character called Pangloss is believed to be a parody of philosophers who spent their time idly wondering about the world or debating points that have no real significance to life situations.Â For instance, Pangloss keeps on saying that the world is good despite all of the misfortunes that have befallen him.
Many experts believe that Voltaire was also making fun at G.W. von Leibniz, a seventeenth-century philosopher who was part of a greater movement called theodicy.Â This school of thought explains that evil exists in the world because they serve particular purposes.Â That even if the world is perfect because it was created by a perfect God, it is necessary to allow evil to happen.Â Itâ€™s clear that Voltaire does not believe, like how philosophers did, that there is an inherent goodness in everything and that everything happens for a reason, even the bad ones.
Setting: The nobility of France
In this play, the setting could be defined as the society, which is present at that time.Â In other words, some members of the nobility of France were part of Candideâ€™s life, like Cunegonde and her brother.Â One example wherein Voltaire poked fun at this class is when he related that the baronâ€™s sister didnâ€™t marry Candideâ€™s father because he only had â€œseventy-one noble lineages.â€
Action: Jacques Death
Jacques, a good man who helped Candide and Pangloss, fell on a turbulent sea as he was rescuing a sailor.Â The sailor, instead of helping Jacques to get back to the ship ignored the poor man, which resulted to his death.Â In this example, it would seem that Voltaire is parodying the Christian preaching of good overcoming evil.Â Here, Jacques did a good deed and was a good man but he died because of it.Â To add to the mockery, Pangloss even said that the sea outside Lisbon was specifically created so that Jacques could drown in it.
Arouet, Francois-Marie.Â â€œCandide by Voltaire.â€ Courier Dover Publications, 1991.
Ward, Selena, and Jaffee, Valerie.Â â€œCandide.â€Â Sparknotes Home Page.Â 21 July 2008
12/5/2019 0 Comments
Class Constitutional Convention - Essay Example
citizens do. Otherwise, this creates a rift between naturalized citizens and natural-born U.S. citizens. It denotes that naturalized citizenship is somehow less important than the natural-born U.S. citizenâ€™s right. This is not true, but basically that is what our society is saying to immigrants who have become naturalized citizensâ€”sending the message that they may be citizens, but they will never be accepted in the way natural-born U.S. citizens are.
The cons of taking such a position would include the following: people might possibly think that a foreign-born President of the U.S. might only have the interests of his or her native country at heart instead of the United States. Also, Americans would probably see it as an area of concern that someone who was not necessarily originally from the United States might have other agendas in mind than besides having the nationâ€™s interest at heart. Another element that might prevent foreign-born naturalized citizens in becoming President is that he or she might be scrutinized based upon his or her accent or appearance more than the content of what the candidate would actually be saying. Itâ€™s not polite to say, perhaps, but people profile others as to how they think their candidate should look, speak, and act. These are just a few examples of why this position has some cons. Hopefully these issues can be analyzed more in-depth so that we can give our natur alized brother and sister citizens the same possibility to believe in the dream of becoming President if they wish to do so.
Whether one believes that foreign-born naturalized citizens should be able to become President or not is not so much the issue as this is an issue of fairness. No one has control over the fact of where in the world they are born; that is just a matter of consequence. However, foreign-born naturalized citizens should not be punished just because
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.